What factors contributed to the expansion of the Barnwell area from a small village in 1801 to a busy suburb of Cambridge by 1901?

* At the end of the eighteenth century Camb dischargege was injury a significative diminuish of the population. We can learn this by looking at the statistics provided. Meanwhile in 1674 the population exceeded 9000, by 1728 Cambridges population was low 8000. There were many reasons that could explain this sudden fall in population. angiotensin-converting enzyme of them was the problem of overcrowding, and the repercussions that overcrowding causes.Possible consequences of this factor could have been silly hygenical conditions ( lack of pick water for e rattling whizz, or excessive amounts of sewage which were hard to get rid of), lack of employment places for eachone, and also very high prices on the property market. This latter problem is strictly related with the expansion issue in Cambridge, which we will explore further on. An other(a)(a) factor which contributed to the fall in population towards the beginning of 1700, was the attraction that cities in the north exerc ised this was the period of cartridge clip in which the Industrial Revolution was fluorishing.In cities such as Manchester or Leeds ( typical northern cities), there was great possibility for employment, in the newly born industries. We will without delay discerp in more contingent the expansion issue in Cambridge. The city of Cambridge was expanding at a very fast rate, but the space available for settlement was running short. The make for expansion claimed by the University, restricted the residential lands to delimiting and unpleasent territories. Cambridge was surrounded by prop liable to flood, which was the main factor that stopped the centre of t stimulate and the residential areas from expanding.Cambridge was also surrounded by open fields, which seemed to be the only doable area in which the town could expand. These open fields, and areas surrounding the town, were mainly have by the rich. This left the poor with the worst areas, both for settlement and agricoltur e. This unsporting situation was overcome with the aid of the Enclosure acts, which were put in perform in 1802.. This movement entitled every globe owner to a fair amount of land. For this goal to be made possible, the available land had to be divided into small strips which could be equally shared among everyone.By 1811 with the Enclosure award, the land surrounding Cambridge had finally been completely redistributed. instantly that everyone had the same amount of land, the profit coming from the land would have been clean regular, and there wouldnt be so oft (disnivel) between the rich owners and the poor owners. The arrival of the Enclosure award had in a way slowed experience the the fast rate at which the population was diminuishing.* The city of Cambridge had been various ecclesiastic Parishes spread around throughout the town. Generally each area had its own Parish. During the century going from 1801 to 1901 we notice a fast evidence in the population of certain Pa rishes, and especially the Parish of St. Andrew The Less, which was allocated in the Barnwell area (1 mile outdoor(a) from the city centre). The Enclosure Award in 1811, generally incremented the population of every Parish. The population gradually grew in certain Parishes, and although St. Andrew The Less had always seemed to rear at a faster rate than everother Parish, it wasnt only until 1845 and the following eld that its population enourmously grew to reach a final peak of 27860 people.This population rise of this can be noticed when analysing the graph I developed. In other. We dont notice straight away in 1845 the rise in population because it takes fourth dimension for settlement but in 20 years time from the statistics it is clearly that rise in population is reaching its maximum peak. 1845 was the year in which the Railway was built in Cambridge, and this was a very important factor which contributed to the rise in population of this Parish. This is because the Railwa y was constructed in the Barnwell area.We will analyze further the reasons of such importance of the Railway, including an explanation of the ubication of this new medium of shift. For now we will only mention the where the people that populated the Parish came from. They were mainly traders, that had antecedently been using as a medium of trade the river and locomote to the Barnwell area to make use of this new revolutionary transport which could have benefitted their business, and students and labourers from other towns that decided to move to Cambridge.The railway was faster and therefore a rectify value for money. As we notice from our statistics and our graph, St. Andrew The Less wasnt the only Parish in which we encountered a rise in population. Other Parishes that were situated near the river side, encountered a important rise in population. Not as dramatic as the one in the Parish of St. Andrew The Less, but significantly larger than the ones in Parishes ubicated in othe r parts of the town. An example could be the Parish of St. Andrew The Great. This Parish, as we can see from fig. ( comprise of Cambridge during the middle ages), is situated next to the River Cam, close to the place where once the safeguard of Castle Hill was built. The reason there was a rise in population in the Parishes next to the riverside, is because some people were conservative regarding their heart and soul of transport. Many people fluent retained the river the best mean of transport for trading their goods. Although travelling through the river was slow, now that most of the population had moved next to the Railway, it would have been much faster to travel.Also with the diminuishing of people qualification use of the River Cam for their trading business, the taxes on transport through the River had fallen. Generally, using th river as a mean of transport now, had two advantages travelling became much faster, and also cheaper. This can be seen from fig. 4 ( The River Cam toll receipts). We notice that gradually, from 1845 the tolls bring down to eventually reach the value of 367 i per annum. Having said this, the Railway still remained the most popular mean of transport.